Xenopus laevis Oocyte Recording Solutions
This document allows quick comparisons of recording solutions used by several investigators for patch clamping Xenopus laevis oocytes. Please refer to the cited references for complete descriptions of the solutions and the experimental designs for which they are appropriate. Non-referenced solutions are those used by the site author.
BATH SOLUTIONS
- Modified Barth's Soln (MBSH), 500 mL (Yost et al, 1994).
- 500 mL, pH 7.0, 211 mOsm.
- Titrate with NaOH. This solution may be used for storage of frog oocytes as well as a bath solution for voltage clamp experiments. Titrate the pH before adding divalents.
-
| |
MW |
mM |
g |
| NaCl |
58.44 |
88 |
2.57 |
| KCl |
75.55 |
1 |
0.04 |
| HEPES |
238.31 |
10 |
1.19 |
| NaHCO3 |
84.00 |
2.4 |
0.10 |
| CaCl2 |
110.99 |
1 |
0.05 |
| Ca(NO3)2 |
164.10 |
1 |
0.082 |
- Saline Bath Solution (Heinemann et al, 1992)
- 500 mL, pH 7.0, 255 mOsm
- Titrate with NaOH
-
| |
MW |
mM |
g |
| NaCl |
58.44 |
115 |
3.36 |
| HEPES |
238.31 |
10 |
1.19 |
| CaCl2 |
110.99 |
1.8 |
0.010 |
- Depolarizing Bath Solution (Heinemann et al, Nature, 356, 441, 1992)
- 500 mL, pH 7.2, 256 mOsm
- Titrate with KOH
-
| |
MW |
mM |
g |
| NaCl |
58.44 |
16 |
0.47 |
| KCl |
74.55 |
100 |
3.73 |
| EGTA |
380.4 |
1.8 |
0.34 |
| HEPES |
238.31 |
10 |
1.19 |
- Depolarizing Bath Solution (Ellinor et al, Nature, 363, 455, 1993)
- 500 mL, pH 7.2, 240 mOsm
- Titrate with KOH.
-
| |
MW |
mM |
g |
| K-aspartate |
172.2 |
100 |
8.61 |
| EGTA |
380.4 |
10 |
1.90 |
| HEPES |
238.31 |
10 |
1.19 |
- K-Methanesulfonate Depolarizing Solution for Frog Oocytes, 250 mL
- 250 mL, pH 7.4, 244 mOsm
- Titrate with methanesulfonic acid.
-
| |
MW |
mM |
g |
| KOH |
56.10 |
115 |
1.61 |
| EGTA |
380.4 |
1 |
0.09 |
| HEPES |
238.31 |
10 |
0.60 |
| glucose* |
180.16 |
3 |
0.13 |
| MgCl2** |
95.23 |
4 |
0.09 |
*Add more to adjust osmolarity (~5.3 g does the trick)
- Hypertonic Saline for Removal of Vitelline Membrane, 500 mL (Ebihara, 1992)
- 500 mL, pH 7.2, 480 mOsm
- Titrate with KOH. This saline is sufficiently hypertonic (~480 mOSm) to separate the vitelline membrane from the oocyte. However, the osmolarity can be pushed up to about 600 mOsm with additional K-aspartate to facilitate a faster and more complete separation without damage to the oocyte. Beware the oocyte that does not shrink after immersion in hypertonic saline as these generally have low resting membrane potentials when checked with two-electrode voltage clamp. They may be damaged or dead.
-
| |
MW |
mM |
g |
| K-aspartate |
172.2 |
200 |
17.22 |
| KCl |
74.55 |
20 |
0.75 |
| MgCl2 |
95.23 |
1 |
0.05 |
| EGTA |
380.4 |
10 |
1.90 |
| HEPES |
238.31 |
10 |
1.19 |
RECORDING ELECTRODE SOLUTIONS
- Cell-AttachedRecording Electrode Soln for Na Channels (Heinemann et al, 1992)
- 500 mL, pH 7.2, 257 mOsm
- Titrate with NaOH.
-
| |
MW |
mM |
g |
| NaCl |
58.44 |
100 |
2.92 |
| KCl |
74.55 |
16 |
0.60 |
| CaCl2 |
110.99 |
1.8 |
0.10 |
| HEPES |
238.31 |
10 |
1.19 |
- Cell-Attached Recording Electrode Solution for Ca Channels (Ellinor et al, 1993)
- 500 mL, pH 7.2, 365 mOsm
- Titrate with KOH
| |
MW |
mM |
g |
| BaCl2 |
208.25 |
115 |
11.97 |
| HEPES |
238.31 |
10 |
1.192 |
- Recording Electrode Solution for Outside-Out Patches, 250 mL
- 250 mL, pH 7.4, 244 mOsm
- Titrate with KOH
-
| |
MW |
mM |
g |
| KCl |
74.55 |
102 |
1.90 |
| EGTA |
380.4 |
10 |
0.95 |
| HEPES |
238.31 |
10 |
0.60 |
| MgCl2* |
95.23 |
4 |
0.09 |
*Improves seal formation (Hilgemann, 1995)
- Recording Electrode Solution for NMDA Receptors, 250 mL
- 250 mL, pH 7.4, 244 mOsm
- Titrate with NaOH. Add 10 µM glycine and 10 µM NMDA last.
-
| |
MW |
mM |
g |
| NaCl |
58.44 |
115 |
1.68 |
| KCl |
74.55 |
2.5 |
0.05 |
| HEPES |
238.31 |
10 |
0.60 |
| CaCl2 |
110.99 |
1.8 |
0.05 |
REFERENCES
- Rudy and L.E. Iverson (eds.), In Methods in Enzymology, vol. 207. San Diego, Academic Press. p.376-380.
- Heinemann et al. 1992. Nature, 356, 441.
- Hilgemann, D.W. 1995. The giant membrane patch. In B. Sakmann and E. Neher (eds.),
- Single-Channel Recording. Plenum Press, New York. p. 307-327.
- Stühmer, W. & Parekh, A.B. 1995. Electrophysiological recordings from Xenopus oocytes. In B. Sakmann and E. Neher (eds.), Single Channel Recording, 2nd ed., New York, Plenum Press. p. 350-351.
- Yost CS, Maestrone E. 1994. Anesth Analg, 78, 520-526.